Miami Pace DB Logan Oce holding offer from Western Michigan and Bowling Green

While the majority focus is on the upcoming class of 2013 in recruiting circles, it is not unusual for the bigger schools to extend offers to the next class which would be 2014 in this case. The Miami Hurricanes have gotten a jump on the race for 2014 talent by extending 26 offers already.
Breaking down the positions that the Canes have extended 2014 offers to:
4 Running Backs
5 wide receivers
2 Tight Ends
5 Offensive Linemen
3 Defensive Tackles
2 Defensive Ends
4 Linebackers
1 Defensive Back
Notables among the offered are Sony Michel, running back out of American Heritage High School in Plantation. Michel has been on the recruiting radar for three years now despite moving into his junior year this coming Fall. Michel was offered by the Canes as a freshman. Miami Central running back Dalvin Cook also has an offer from the Canes. Jamil Kamara, wide receiver out of Virginia also has a Cane offer. The 6’2″ 190 lb. prospect can count Miami as one of 23 offers he is currently holding. 6’7″ offensive tackle Orlando Brown out of Suwanee, GA has 17 offers with Miami being one of them.
On the defensive side of the ball, Woodbridge, VA defensive tackle Da’Shawn Hand has a Miami Hurricane offer among 24 others from big programs around the country. Defensive End Andrew Brown out of Chesapeake, VA has 23 offers with Miami being one of them. Defensive Back Quin Blanding is one of the most heavily recruiting 2014 defensive backs with 21 offers and Miami is a part of that group.
Of the 26 offers the Canes have extended to 2014 prospect at this point, 15 of them belong to players that reside outside of the state of Florida. The Canes have only one commit out of the 2014 class thus far and that is Miami Central H.S. offensive tackle Trevor Darling who pledged to the Canes on April 5th of this year.
This article is part II to an article I wrote a year ago about the most sensible way to align the teams in Division I college football to allow for a workable format for a playoff system.
In this article, not only do I show you the way the conference can be broken up with regional sense but I also walk you through how the conference championship games would look, how the playoff brackets would be set and how the bowl games can still be played in conjunction with this system. In addition, I lay out the dates that each event could take place and show how it can all be worked into the same amount of time that is currently being allotted for the current BCS system.
Just as a reference point, I am posting my suggestion for conference alignments once again as I will need to point back to it in explaining the other aspects of the plan. You will notice that the alignments have a regional feel and quality to it. You will also notice that I do not lump all the mid-tier teams into a conference together. The mid-tier teams are mixed in amongst others. Those programs’ desires to obtain a championship will promote parity.
Each team each year would play every team in their division once and then matchup against a division from another conference for their remaining games. For example. In 2011 the Southern Conference East Division would play all the teams from Southwest Conference West Division for their non-conference games. This would be rotated each year and no conference division would play the other division within their own conference. So, in no given year would the Eastern Division of the Southern Conference play the teams in the Western Division Southern Conference for their non-divisional games.
Your overall record would be used to determine division winners with record within the division to be used as tiebreakers.
In this plan, every team plays 11 regular season games.
Conference Alignments
East Region | West Region | |||
Southern Conference | Southwest Conference | |||
Miami | Alabama | LSU | Tex A&M | |
FSU | Florida | TCU | Texas | |
Georgia Tech | Georgia | Baylor | Houston | |
FAU | USF | Louisiana Tech | SMU | |
UCF | Troy St. | Rice | N. Texas | |
FIU | UAB | ULL | Arkansas St. | |
Southeast Conference | Mid-American Conference | |||
Auburn | South Carolina | Iowa | Pittsburgh | |
Tennessee | Clemson | Purdue | Illinois | |
Miss. St. | Ole Miss. | Notre Dame | Missouri | |
Memphis | Vanderbilt | Iowa St. | Indiana | |
S. Miss. | Tulane | Ball St. | Miami Ohio | |
Mid. Ten. St. | Lou. Monroe | Bowling Green | Marshall | |
Northeastern Conference | Midwestern Conference | |||
Penn St. | Ohio St. | Oklahoma | Nebraska | |
Boston College | U.Conn | Oklahoma St. | Arkansas | |
Syracuse | Cincinnati | Colorado | Kansas | |
Navy | Rutgers | Colorado St. | Kansas St. | |
Army | Temple | Tulsa | Wyoming | |
Buffalo | Kent. St. | Air Force | Idaho | |
Mideastern Conference | Mountain West Conference | |||
Virginia Tech | North Carolina | Texas Tech | Boise St. | |
Virginia | Wake Forest | Arizona | BYU | |
West Virginia | NC State | Arizona St. | Utah | |
Louisville | Maryland | UNLV | Nevada | |
Kentucky | East Carolina | New Mexico | Utah St. | |
W. Kentucky | Duke | New Mexico St. | Utep | |
Northern Lakes Conference | Western Conference | |||
Wiconsin | Michigan | Oregon | California | |
Minnesota | Michigan St. | Oregon St. | Stanford | |
Toledo | Northwestern | Washington | USC | |
W. Michigan | Eastern Michigan | Washington St. | UCLA | |
C. Michigan | N. Illinois | San Jose St. | Hawaii | |
Akron | Ohio | Fresno St. | San Diego St. |
Below I have used the strength and records of the teams during the 2011 season to construct a hypothetical set of conference championship games to demonstrate how the system would work. Every conference would have a championship game pitting the teams with the best records from each division against each other. See what that would look like below.
Conference Championship Games
Conference Championship Games | |||||
East Region | Winner | ||||
N23 | Southern Conference | Florida St. | Alabama | Alabama | |
N23 | Southeast Conference | Auburn | South Carolina | South carolina | |
N24 | Northeastern Conference | Penn St. | Ohio St. | Penn St. | |
N24 | Mideastern Conference | Virginia Tech | NC State | Virginia Tech | |
N24 | Northern Lakes Conference | Wisconsin | Michigan | Wisconsin | |
West Region | |||||
N23 | Southwest Conference | LSU | Texas | LSU | |
N23 | Mid-American Conference | Notre Dame | Missouri | Notre Dame | |
N24 | Midwestern Conference | Oklahoma St. | Arkansas | Oklahoma St. | |
N24 | Mountain West Conerence | Arizona St. | Boise St. | Boise St. | |
N24 | Western Conference | Oregon | Stanford | Oregon |
Now that we know who are playoff teams are after the conference championships, we can now begin filling our bowl games with their match ups. In my system, bowl match ups are predetermined by the place in which teams finished within their respective conferences. So, for instance, the Humanitarian Bowl each year would host the Southern Conference East Division 3rd place finisher against the Southwest Conference East Division 3rd place finisher. Under the heading “Conference Matchup” you will see abbreviations. This was done to preserve space. However, the abbreviations are for the conferences with divisions and the numbers stand for the place in which team finished. So SECE-2 would stand for Southeast Conference East Division 2nd place finisher. Moving further down the bowl list NECrun would stand for the Northeast Conference runner-up which would be the team that lost the conference championship game. In the bigger bowl games like the Cotton Bowl for example, you see ERDL1 v. WRDL1. This provides for losers of the playoff games to play in bowl games. So ERDL1 would mean East Region Round 1 loser v. WRDL1 West Region round 1 loser.
Bowl Game Matchups
date | Bowl Games | Conference Matchup | Hypothetical 2011 matchups | ||
1 | D11 | Humanitarian | SCE-3 v. SWCE-3 | Miami | TCU |
2 | D11 | New Orleans | SCW-3 v. SWCW-3 | Florida | Texas A&M |
3 | D11 | St. Petersburg | SECE-3 v. MACE-3 | Mississippi St. | Purdue |
4 | D12 | Las Vegas | SECW-3 v. MACW-3 | Vanderbilt | Pittsburgh |
5 | D12 | Poinsettia Bowl | NECE-3 v. MWCE-3 | Syracuse | Tulsa |
6 | D13 | Hawaii Bowl | NECW-3 v. MWCW-3 | Rutgers | Nebraska |
7 | D13 | Little Caesars Bowl | MECE-3 v. MWCE-3 | Virginia | Arizona |
8 | D13 | Independence Bowl | MECW-3 v. MWCW-3 | Wake Forest | Utah |
9 | D14 | Champs Sports | NLCE-3 v. WCE-3 | Western Michigan | Washington St. |
11 | D14 | Insight | NLCW-3 v. WCW-3 | N. Illinois | California |
12 | D18 | Military Bowl | SCE-2 v. SWCE-2 | Georgia Tech | Baylor |
13 | D18 | Texas Bowl | SCW-2 v. SWCW-2 | Georgia | Houston |
14 | D18 | Alamo Bowl | SECE-2 v. MACE-2 | Southern Miss. | Iowa |
15 | D19 | Armed Forces Bowl | SECW-2 v. MACW-2 | Clemson | Illinois |
16 | D19 | Music City Bowl | NECE-2 v. MWCE-2 | Boston College | Oklahoma |
17 | D20 | Holiday Bowl | NECW-2 v. MWCW-2 | Cincinnati | Kansas St. |
18 | D20 | Car Care Bowl | MECE-2 v. MWCE-2 | West Virginia | Texas Tech |
19 | D20 | Sun Bowl | MECW-2 v. MWCW-2 | North Carolina | BYU |
20 | D21 | Liberty Bowl | NLCE-2 v. WCE-2 | Toledo | Washington |
21 | D21 | Chick-fil-A Bowl | NLCW-2 v. WCW-2 | Michigan St. | USC |
22 | D27 | Outback Bowl | SECrun v. MACrun | Florida St. | Texas |
23 | D28 | Capital One Bowl | NECrun v. MWCrun | Ohio St. | Missouri |
24 | D29 | Gator Bowl | MECrun v. MtWCrun | NC State | Arizona St. |
25 | J1 | Compass Bowl | ERD1L v. WRD1L | Penn St. | Notre Dame |
26 | J1 | Cotton Bowl | ERDL1 v. WRD1L | Michigan | Stanford |
27 | J1 | Rose Bowl | ERD1L v. WRD1L | Auburn | Arkansas |
28 | J2 | Fiesta Bowl | ERD2L v. WRD2L | South Carolina | Boise St. |
29 | J3 | Orange Bowl | ERD2L v. WRD2L | Virginia Tech | Oregon |
30 | J4 | Sugar Bowl | ERD3L v. WRD3L | Wisconsin | Oklahoma St. |
31 | J8 | National Championship | ERD3W v. WRD3W | Alabama | LSU |
Now that we have that out of the way, we can take a look at what the playoff brackets look like. In this proposed system you have a 14 team playoff. You get your Top 10 teams from the conference championship games and you also get two wildcard teams from the East Region along with two wildcard teams from the West Region. You select those wildcard teams as the two highest ranked teams in East Region that lost their championship games. If you end up with situation where you don’t have ranked conference losers than you set up some parameters for selection and tiebreaker to take the two next best teams from each region that weren’t champions. The majority of the time you will end up with ranked teams that lost championship games.
The highest ranked team in the East Region and the West Region would get first round byes while everyone else would play week one. From there you carry through the normal course of a bracket playoff system and illustrated below. The notations at the top with a letter and number stand for the date in which the games would take place. So D15 stands for Dccember 15th.
Playoff Brackets
Playoff Brackets | ||||
D8 | D15 | D22 | J8 | |
Round 1 | Round 2 | Round 3 | Championship | |
East Region | ||||
Alabama | Alabama | |||
Bye | ||||
Alabama | ||||
South Carolina | South Carolina | |||
Penn St. | Alabama | |||
Michigan * | Virginia Tech | |||
Virginia Tech | ||||
Wisconsin | ||||
Auburn * | Wisconsin | |||
Wisconsin | ||||
West Region | ||||
LSU | LSU | |||
Bye | ||||
LSU | ||||
Notre Dame | ||||
Boise St. | Boise St. | |||
LSU | ||||
Stanford I | Oklahoma St. | |||
Oklahoma St. | ||||
Oklahoma St. | ||||
Arkansas * | Oregon | |||
Oregon |
In the end, each team plays 11 regular season games. The two teams that play in the championship game would have either played 14 or 15 games at the end of the season. You have teams now playing 13 and 14 games in a season. So there’s no extra wear and tear to worry about.
I will continue to expand on this as questions and comments are received about the workings of this system. This system makes the most sense to me. By all means, share your thoughts.
Now you can listen to Gridironstuds.com on your computer and call in to have a discussion. Gridironstuds.com founder Chad Wilson hosts a daily radio show on BlogTalkRadio.com where he discusses issues in the World of football coming from the NFL, college football, high school and youth football plus college football recruiting. Check out the Gridiron Studs Show daily from Noon to 1 P.M. set on Blog Talk Radio. Click here for the Show’s home page or listen to past shows using the player located in the upper right hand corner of this page
We have all seen the hoopla that surrounds National Signing Day. Espn gives you 24 hour coverage seemingly on that date in February. The major recruiting sites are abuzz for the month leading up to and the month after the signing date. There’s much speculation about where the top recruits will sign and much analysis of each school’s signing class after the letter of intent day. However, what gets lost in the shuffle is the number of players from those signing classes that don’t make it on campus at least for their freshman year.
After reading a story that one of the University of Miami’s 2012 recruits, WR Angelo Louis Jean may have to enter a prep school, I began wondering how many athletes like Jean each year fall into this category. In trying to research this topic, I found very little in terms of numbers regarding this. I am assuming and this may be incorrectly, that these numbers are not kept but I would like it if they were. I have seen it happen all too often. After all of the celebration of a scholarship signing we often miss the news that the player can’t attend the school. It’s almost like celebrating a Lotto Jackpot win and finding out that the number on the promotional check was 50% less than what the winner received (before taxes wise guys!).
Prep schools are here for this purpose but it seemed back in my day that players headed to prep school didn’t sign letters of intent with major colleges. Also, there weren’t cameras present at signing days unless you were one of the top 3 elite players in the county. This is my way of telling you that I am getting old. What many people don’t realize is that a number of these players that head to the prep schools don’t end up going to the school they originally signed with. The players at the prep school can be recruited by anyone else while there. Prep schools have incentives to protect the “property” of the universities that park players in their program but that does not always happen.
Some players also fail to meet the requirements at a prep school and never end up going to college. How often is that reported and where does that fit into the grade recruiting analysts give these college recruiting classes? I have heard of far too many cases where players that were picking up hats in front of a large auditorium crowd and television audience never put on the uniform that matches the hat. I will continue to research this phenomenon and hunt down some numbers. The only numbers I could readily find was research that said 40% of the 2012 class would have failed to meet the entry requirements that will be put in place in 2016. A quick look at the new requirements shows that a recruit will need a minimum 2.3 GPA (up from 2.0) and they will need to have completed at least 10 of the required 16 units of core classes by the start of their senior year. So, with this in mind, we could see even more desks being added to prep schools across the country if athletes don’t get more serious about their education.
Stay tuned, more to come on this topic for sure.
Here’s a look at my grades on each of the 32 NFL teams’ drafts. I have a formula for draft picking and team building. It’s very simple and I use it to grade drafts along with other factors.
Here are the positions you need to draft:
QB, RB, DT, WR, CB, LT, DE, MLB, WR2, DT2, FS, TE
Stay in those areas and your ability to have a successful draft increases greatly.
The other positions listed below, you address in free agency with low key signings. Not big named additions that achieved famed success elsewhere and will have a hard time doing things your way in you organization. Here those positions:
DE2, RT, OLB, C, FB, LG, OLB2, RG, SS
A ‘2’ next to a position means the 2nd player at that position. So WR2 means second best wide receiver.
Here are my draft grades
Team | Grade | Comment |
AFC East | ||
New England | A | Attacked weaknesses on defense. Drafted at all key spots. Got value with late picks on Dennard |
Buffalo | B – | Better picks available than their 1,3 and 4th round picks. Addressed weaknesses. |
Miami | C | Reached with 1st rnd pick. Yet another OL in draft. Unpolished pick at 3. Failed to address WR. No impact players. |
NY Jets | B | Impact player with 1st rnd pick. Got what they needed with 2nd pick. Drafted outside of key area. |
AFC North | ||
Baltimore | B – | Strong 1st rnd pick. Question two guards drafted. Intruiging pick with Streeter at #198. |
Cleveland | A – | Got their player in rnd 1. Addressed uncertainty at QB. Lost points for guard draft and 2 ILBs |
Cincinnati | A – | Solid pick at #17. Lose points for 1st rnd guard pick. Sanu a steal as is Charles. Addressed key areas |
Pittsburgh | B – | Lose pts with OG 1st round. Spence in 3rd round could pay off. Downgraded for 2 guards in draft |
AFC South | ||
Houston | B – | Not solid on 1st rnd. Downgraded for OG, OC picks at 3 and 4th plus K pick in 5th. Need more impact players |
Indianapolis | A – | Solid 1st. Got impact player at 3. Value with 5th with Ballard. Drafted mostly in key areas. |
Jacksonville | B | Nice move to get Blackmon. Downgrades for punter and OLB pick. |
Tennessee | B – | Solid 1st and 3rd. OLB in 2nd led to downgrade. Limited picks. Seemed like better picks were available with most picks. |
AFC West | ||
San Diego | A – | Addressed some key areas. Lost a grade for OG and OC picks at 5 and 7. |
Oakland | C | No impact players. Loses grades for OG and a pair of OLB picks. Reached with most picks |
Denver | B | Osweiller lacks exp.to be big time. OC and OLB picks cost them grade. 2, 3 and 4th was solid |
Kansas City | B | Risky 1st pick with Poe. OG pick with 2nd is a downgrade. Unspectacular with rest but stayed with key areas with most picks |
Team | Grade | Comment |
NFC East | ||
Dallas | B | Solid #1 pick. Not much impact with others. Wait and see type picks with the rest of draft. |
Washington | C | Got Griffin but Cousins a head scratcher. Downgrades for two OG and OLB pick. |
Philadelphia | A | Addressed need with solid pick at 1. Stayed with picks at crucial draft positions |
NY Giants | B + | Wilson a good back have to see where he fits. Randle good pick up. Stayed with key draft. Positions |
NFC North | ||
Green Bay | A | Two solid DL picks at 1 & 2. Hayward solid corner picks. Addressed def need. They just know what they are doing. |
Detroit | B | Addressed OT need. Broyles could pay off big. Bentley good pick up at CB. Attacked secondary needs |
Minnesota | A | Addressed needs with solid players. Liked moves in secondary and WR. Don’t like K picks but got a good one. |
Chicago | B – | Unspectacular. Reached with 1st pick and 2nd pick. Attacked secondary needs but with who? |
NFC South | ||
New Orleans | B – | Not many picks. Picked a player from Regina at 3. Hope he’s good. Nick Toon good pick. Obscure with the rest. |
Atlanta | C | What did they do? Went OL with 1st two picks. Nothing to write home about with the rest. |
Tampa Bay | A | Lost on Richardson but battled back with Barron & Martin. David solid pick. Sent message to Blount by picking 2 backs and a FB in this draft. |
Carolina | B – | Reached with 1st round pick, picked a guard at #2, didn’t really get impact players. |
NFC West | ||
Arizona | B + | Floyd good pick up next to Fitzgerald. Filled some needs. Lindley pick at 6 could be sleeper |
St. Louis | A | Reached with 1st pick. Loved next 4 picks. Jenkins a risk but high reward. Pead will surprise |
Seattle | A – | Reached for Irvin but filled a need with a good player. Wilson intriguing. Turbin solid. Filled needs |
San Francisco | C | Reached with 1st round pick. Didn’t need another back. Downgraded for OG, OLB and OC picks |