2 thoughts on “More On the Number of Tennessee Football Offers for 2010

  1. What is the point? This is nothing out of the ordinary for UT.

    You don’t seem to comprehend that the Vols are forced to recruit nationally and cannot rely on in-state talent like many states.

    This is something Tennessee has always had to do and always will, it was EXACTLY the same under Fulmer.

    Comparing us to the dominate state schools in states like Georgia, Alabama, Florida, etc. is ridiculous, because of the in-state talent those states have that they can rely on getting. We don’t have that luxury, if we want to compete, we have to bring in players from all over the nation.

    Also, using Scout to measure anything regarding football is a joke.

  2. The point is that the number of offers is higher than anyone else making it news-worthy. The Vols aren’t the only team that is forced to recruit nationally. Notre Dame, Penn St., Michigan and others recruit nationally and none have an offer list close to being as long as Tennessee’s. Just because you recruit nationally doesn’t mean you got out and offer every kid you come across with a name in every state you visit. The number of offers out there begs the question if Tennessee is doing their due diligence in checking backgrounds. It’s also begs the question, what are they going to do when the commitments roll in from kids that aren’t their number one targets. Are they going to pull offers and piss off kids and high school coaches? These questions make this a news worthy subject.

    If you read the original article, it stated that Tennessee had 187 offers out there. I used Scout as a measuring stick because it was able to give me a general idea of how many offers some of the other schools had out there. Sure the numbers are off but they aren’t in terms how far ahead in the offer game Tennessee is compared to everyone else.

Leave a Reply