Wanting Early PT Not A Sign of Weakness for College Football Recruits

By: Chad Wilson – Publisher Gridironstuds.com Blog  @Gridironstuds

The day to day march through the Internet gathering information on recruits runs me into an on going theme for for college football recruits.  The theme is playing time, also know as PT.

You will hear many of your top recruits talking about a desire for early playing time as a factor in where they will make their decision.  What I have noticed as a common response by fans to this factor is that the recruit is “afraid of competition”.  This is not the case.

With each passing year,  recruits and their parents are becoming more educated on the recruiting process.  The proliferation of recruiting websites reporting the ins and outs of the recruiting business have given parents and recruits alike an insight into how things work.  Now, more than ever, schools are able to cast a wider net in acquiring recruits and through the internet they are able to gauge interests while educating recruits about what their school has to offer.  In the past, recruits were pretty much relegated to choosing from schools in their immediate area because they knew precocious little about schools elsewhere.  They did not have the ability  to learn about other programs nor did they have a budget that would allow them to travel to many of the schools interested in them.  This is no longer the case.

Choosing a program is a business decision for the recruit just as it is for the program.  In making that business decision,  recruits must determine their role in the program recruiting them and match it up against the others that are in the race.  If a program is stock piled with young All-Americans at a recruit’s position then it is only natural that another program that has less traffic at their position would become more desirable.  NFL salaries are a common known fact nowadays.  Kids are choosing a school in hopes that someday they can earn their chance at the huge pot of gold that seems to be the NFL.  Their athletic prowess is their livelihood.  After all, aren’t the non-athletes choosing schools based on the ability of that school to set them up for a career post graduation?

The NFL is plucking talent from any and everywhere these days.  The first overall pick in the 2013 NFL draft was from Central Michigan, a Mid-American Conference school (MAC).  Kids are paying attention and are realizing that playing early and making your mark increases your chances of becoming a draft pick when your college playing days are up.  So looking for a school that provides the best opportunity to do that would seem to be a wise business decision for many of the prospective recruits.  College coaches are selling their depth chart in the recruiting process so one should not be shocked when you hear a kid say I am looking for early playing time.

When a recruit shuns your school,  this not should be greeted with chants that a kid is “afraid of competition”.  What is really happening is a kid making a business decision and using his leverage and options to arrive at the best decision for his future.  This may be a tough pill for a hard core fan to swallow as there seems precious little reason in your mind for a recruit not to love your school as much as you do.  Putting on your “I’m a Human Being” hat,  you have to see it from the kid’s point of view.

Saying a kid wanting early playing time is a problem may be quite the opposite.  In some cases you may need to worry about a kid who could care less about getting on the field.  That player may be looking to just grab the education and not go all out to be a contributor to the on-field success of a program.  Of course, there are kids that don’t care about the depth chart and will put their best foot forward just like there will be kids who are indeed afraid of competition. However,  let’s not be absolute in our assessment of these young recruits.  You may just be completely wrong about them.

GRIDIRONSTUD Chris Kendle Could Be One to Look Out for in the Future.

It’s not often I get to talk about youth or prep players out of the state of Colorado so when I get the opportunity, I am going to take it.  I get submissions to Gridironstuds.com daily from players all over the country but a recent submission from Colorado caught my eye.

Chris Kendle is a JV Quarterback for Prarie View HS in Thornton, Colorado.  I know most don’t get excited over JV football highlights but many of your football studs spent their time on the JV Squad.  Kendle lists his height at 6’3″ and while I don’t think he is quite that tall, he does present a solid frame for a young QB.  Two things stood out to me on his video and that is his accuracy throwing the football and his athleticism.  In a World where just standing back there and delivering the football is not enough anymore,  Kendle is working with tools that play callers love.  He is called upon to the run the option quite often for his team and runs it well.  He darts in and out of traffic and has the speed to take it the distance.  When the time calls for a perfectly lofted fade, Kendle is there with that as well.  It will be interesting to watch his development over the coming years.  Would love to say you saw him here first on Gridironstuds.com.  Click here to view Chris Kendle’s highlights on Gridironstuds.com.

GridironStuds Show: NFC Preview

Chad Wilson and Emil Calomino broke down the NFC on July 12th on the GridironStuds Show on Blog Talk Radio (click here to listen to archive of show). Below is a breakdown of how both men predicted the NFC will finish this season.

Chad Emil
NFC EAST NFC EAST
NY Giants 11-5 Dallas 11-5
Washington 10-6 NY Giants 10-6
Dallas 8-8 Washington 8-8
Philadelphia 4-12 Philadelphia 6-10
NFC NORTH  NFC NORTH
Green Bay 11-5 Green Bay 12-4
Minnesota 9-7 Minnesota 9-7
Chicago 8-8 Detroit 8-8
Detroit 8-8 Chicago 7-9
NFC SOUTH NFC SOUTH
Carolina 12-4 Atlanta 11-5
Atlanta 10-6 Tampa Bay 9-7
Tampa Bay 9-7 New Orleans 7-9
New Orleans 8-8 Carolina 5-11
NFC WEST NFC WEST
San Francisco 12-4 Seattle 12-4
Seattle 11-5 San Francisco 10-6
St. Louis 8-8 St. Louis 8-8
Arizona 6-10 Arizona 6-10

EMIL’S NFC Champion:  Seattle
CHAD’S NFC Champion: Seattle 

Gridironstuds Show: AFC Season Preview

 

By: Chad Wilson – Editor GridironStuds Blog – @Gridironstuds

Chad Wilson and Emil Calomino broke down the AFC on the July 8th GridironStuds Show on Blog Talk Radio (click here to listen to archive of show).  Below is a breakdown of how both men predicted the AFC will shake out this season.

Chad Emil
AFC EAST AFC EAST
New England 12-4 New England 11-5
Miami 9-7 Miami 9-7
Buffalo 7-9 Buffalo 5-11
NY Jets 6-10 NY Jets 4-12
AFC NORTH AFC NORTH
Pittsburgh 10-6 Cincinnati 10-6
Cincinnati 10-6 Baltimore 10-6
Baltimore 8-8 Pittsburgh 9-7
Cleveland 7-9 Cleveland 6-10
AFC SOUTH AFC SOUTH
Houston 9-7 Houston 12-4
Indianapolis 7-9 Indianapolis 9-7
Tennessee 5-11 Tennessee 7-9
Jacksonville 4-12 Jacksonville 5-11
AFC WEST AFC WEST
Denver 13-3 Denver 12-4
San Diego 9-7 San Diego 8-8
Oakland 5-11 Kansas City 7-9
Kansas City 3-13 Oakland 5-11

Emil’s AFC Champion:  Denver
Chad’s AFC Champion:  Denver

5 Star NFL Draft Report: Big 10

Mike Adams Ohio St.

Continuing my series on BCS Conferences 5 star NFL draft reports, today it’s the Big-10.  Before getting into the numbers it should be pointed out that the Big-10 has 12 teams in it’s conference (don’t ask!) and thus has less teams than the two previous conferences I have reported on, the ACC with 14 and the SEC with 16.  It should also be noted that the Big-12 conference has 10 teams in it which is high grade Tom Foolery but that’s a whole other article at another time.

Getting into the numbers, only four of the Big-10’s twelve teams landed a five star from the 2008-2010 recruiting classes and overall only 10 five stars landed at Big-10 schools during this time period.  That is four less than the ACC and 33 less than the SEC which is way out in front of everyone.  Of the 10 for the conference,  Ohio St. has six of them and has the highest performance total for the conference.

The Big-10 does come in with the highest ratio of draftees out of their 5 star recruits from 2008-2010.  50% of the Big-10 5 star recruits have been drafted compared to 46% of the SEC and 20% of the ACC recruits from the same time period.  This is a bit of a skewed stat since some teams may still have 5 stars on their roster.

Once again, here is what I have used for the performance point system:

3 points:  If 5 star recruit was drafted in rounds 1 or 2

2 points: If 5 star recruit was drafted in rounds 3 or 4

1 point: If 5 star recruit was drafted later than the 4th round

0 points: If 5 star is still on the school’s roster or if he transferred or dismissed from the team

-1 point: If 5 star recruit was a free agent or undrafted

 

Here is the 5 star performance chart for the Big-10

Big 10 NFL Draft Report
2008 2009 2010 Total 5s Drafted Points
Ohio St. 4 2 0 6 3 7
Michigan St. 0 0 1 1 1 2
Michigan 0 1 0 1 1 1
Nebraska 1 0 0 1 0 -1

Draft class information was compiled from Rivals.com 

Other Conference Reports:

SEC
ACC 

 

 

5 Star NFL Draft Report: ACC

Nigel Bradham FSU

By: Chad WilsonGridironstuds.com

Continuing my report on how the draft eligible 5 star recruits from each conference feared in the 2013 NFL draft,  today I move to the ACC.

The SEC was the first conference I analyzed and we will see if they set the standard.  As I mentioned in that article,  this report may shed some light on how each program develops talent.  Some may ready too much into this, others may read too little.  I maintain that it reveals something about each program.  Other reports will follow about draft classes that will give a more complete picture.  For now,  let’s just absorb what the 5 stars are telling us.

What will jump out at you if you read the report on the SEC first is how few 5 stars chose the ACC from 2008-2010 in comparison to the SEC.  While the SEC had 43 five star recruits during this time period, the ACC only signed 12.  I expected them to have less given their 12 ACC teams compared to 14 SEC teams but that not by this wide of a margin.  The other startling fact uncovered was that the ACC did not produce one first round 5 star recruit in the 2013 NFL draft.

As expected, Miami and Florida St. led the way with six 5 star recruits from 2008-2010.  Florida St. is on the only school to have produced a draft pick out of a 5 star recruit in the ACC in the 2013 NFL Draft.

As I did with the SEC,  I assigned point totals to quantify the results.  Again,  here is what I used for the point system:

3 points:  If 5 star recruit was drafted in rounds 1 or 2

2 points: If 5 star recruit was drafted in rounds 3 or 4

1 point: If 5 star recruit was drafted later than the 4th round

0 points: If 5 star is still on the school’s roster or if he transferred or  was dismissed from the team

-1 point: If 5 star recruit was a free agent or undrafted

Here is the performance table with the data from the research:

ACC 2013 NFL Draft Report
2008 2009 2010 Total 5s Drafted Points
FSU 2 2 2 6 2 3
NC State 0 0 1 1 0 0
North Carolina 0 1 0 1 0 -1
Miami 3 1 2 6 0 -3

Recruiting data was compiled from Rivals.com

Next 5 star draft report will be The Big 10